The Better Peace Initiative

Ensuring inclusivity and gender sensitivity in peace making

As more governments and multilateral institutions come to acknowledge that inclusivity of civil society, especially women, in peace negotiations and gender sensitivity are essential for the effective prevention and resolution of conflict, many diplomats responsible for implementing Women, Peace and Security policies are asking ‘how do we do it?’

Recognizing the need for practical tools to guide them and to inform women peacebuilders, in 2012 ICAN launched its Better Peace Initiative (BPI). Drawing on consultations with expert practitioners and mediators, the tools offer succinct explanations of the processes, why gender matters and how to ensure inclusivity and gender sensitivity in peace making. The materials are translated for use in multiple settings.

Gender and Inclusion in Mediation and Peace Processes

Gendered Transitional Justice

Better Peace Tool

The Better Peace Tool presents a practical four-part framework for the inclusion of women peacebuilders, offering proactive steps to broaden participation.

More

Better Peace Tool – Arabic

يعطى هذا الدليل نبذة عن تاريخ وتطور عملية صنع السلام فى العصر الحديث ويناقش ستة عوائق لإشراك المرأة وكيفية تخطيهم. كما يقدم أيضا أربعة أطر عملية لاشراك النساء صانعات السلام

More

Better Peace Tool – French

Un guide open source offrant des mesures concrètes pour l’inclusion effective des femmes artisanes de paix et les perspectives de genre dans la médiation, la prévention des conflits, et la consolidation de la paix.

More

Better Peace Tool – Russian

The Better Peace Tool explores the history and evolution of peacemaking in modern times. It considers six common barriers to inclusion and how to overcome them.

More

Better Peace Tool – Spanish

El “instrumento por la paz mejor” explora la historia y evolución de la pacificación en tiempos modernos. Considera seis barreras comunes a la inclusión y como superarlas.

More

Better Peace Tool – Japanese

『ベターピースツール(より良い平和への手段)』は現代における平和創造の歴史と進化を探る試みです。ここでは和平プロセスに女性が参画しようとする際の6つの共通障壁とそれを克服する方法を考えます。

More

Better Peace Tool – Farsi/Persian

ICAN’s Better Peace Tool video in Farsi/Persian explores the history and evolution of peacemaking in modern times and provides practical guidance for overcoming six common barriers to women’s inclusion.

More

Gendered Transitional Justice

The animation explores the various components of transitional justice and offers five practical steps to ensure a gender sensitive and inclusive process.

More

Gendered Transitional Justice – Arabic

The animation explores the various components of transitional justice and offers five practical steps to ensure a gender sensitive and inclusive process.

More

Gendered Transitional Justice – Urdu

The animation explores the various components of transitional justice and offers five practical steps to ensure a gender sensitive and inclusive process.

More

Gendered Transitional Justice – Spanish

In Spanish: Gendered Transitional Justice: Why it matters, how to do it

More

Gendered Transitional Justice – Japanese

The animation explores the various components of transitional justice and offers five practical steps to ensure a gender sensitive and inclusive process.

More

Gendered Transitional Justice – Tamil

The animation explores the various components of transitional justice and offers five practical steps to ensure a gender sensitive and inclusive process.

More

“Women peacebuilders are doing the most dangerous work.”

— Ambassador Don Steinberg, Former US Envoy to Angola

“If war is the industry of men, let peace be the industry of women.”

— Amal Basha, Chair of the Sisters’ Arab Forum for Human Rights & Member of the Yemen National Dialogue Conference

“Women who have not taken up arms in Syria are still a power of peace and symbol of peace; if these women and other civil society figures are not included, I don’t see peace in my country.”

— Dr. Rim Turkmani, Astrophysicist and Co-Founder of Building the Syrian State

“When I was working in Sierra Leone and Northern Uganda – women – particularly women who have endured years and years of conflict – have a certain resilience that puts the rest of us to shame…I figure if they can do that work to rebuild their communities, I could do something to work with them.”

— Betty Murungi, Human Rights Scholar (Kenya)

The Better Peace Tool

The Better Peace Tool explores the history and evolution of peacemaking in modern times. It considers six common barriers to inclusion and how to overcome them. And it presents a four-part framework for the inclusion of women peacebuilders, offering proactive steps to broaden participation.

The Better Peace Tool is currently available in

EnglishArabic, FrenchRussian, Tamil, and Sinhala.

Spanish, Portuguese, Urdu, Farsi/Dari are forthcoming.

Guidance Areas for a Better Peace – Four-Part Framework

Proactive Steps to Realize Inclusion

Barriers to Inclusion

The inclusion of women peacebuilders in peace processes is a crucial step toward a transformative approach to peacemaking, yet it remains elusive in practice.

The Better Peace Tool explores six common barriers to inclusivity. Click on each barrier to explore steps to overcome these challenges.

Barrier One: "We represent everyone"

“We represent everyone”. Conflict parties won’t accept women at the table.

Experience and research show that belligerent parties are open to interaction with civil society actors, notably elders and religious leaders. But on the question of women, there is significant resistance across most contexts. While parties may claim that the exclusion of women is a ‘cultural’ matter, data suggests that it is universal and often steeped in sexist norms. Excuses for the exclusion of women range from “they are not qualified” to “it is not safe for them to travel”—even when women are living in war zones.

How to overcome this barrier? Know more here

 

Barrier Three: “Who are these women anyway?”

“Who are these women anyway?” Questioning the legitimacy of women peacebuilders.

Questioning the legitimacy of a group or individuals is a sure means of excluding them from the mediation process. On the inclusion of women, this ‘legitimacy’ question is often raised. They are framed as either ‘too grassroots’ or ‘too elite’—thus lacking the credibility and credentials to participate in peace talks. At the same time, other civil society groups, such as religious leaders or elders, are more likely to be included without facing these qualification hurdles.

However, the legitimacy of groups that bear arms and use violence is rarely questioned; because they can spoil the process through force, they are often invited to participate without question. This double standard risks incentivizing violence by rewarding perpetrators of conflict with a seat at the table, while overlooking women peacebuilders and other civil society actors committed to nonviolent conflict resolution.

How to overcome this barrier? Know more here

Barrier Five: “I’m here because of my own credentials.”

“I’m here because of my own credentials.” When women delegates say, “We don’t represent women.”

Resistance to inclusivity can come not just from armed groups or state actors but from within civil society, causing tensions between women delegates or representatives and civil society groups. In some cases, women delegates try to disassociate themselves from women on the ground, fearing that their position at the table will be viewed as a token female placeholder rather than a result of their hard work and merit. It is important to remember that simply having a woman at the table does not automatically make her the representative of all women in her country or guarantee that she is linked to the peacebuilding community.

How to overcome this barrier? Know more here

Barrier Two: “The mediator can’t do everything”

“The mediator can’t do everything,” or doesn’t consider inclusion of women a priority.

Given the urgency of ending violence, mediators often assume that women are not directly relevant at the early stages of mediation. Some worry that engaging women will complicate a delicate process, or “overload” the negotiation table, and increase the risk of failure. Even where they favor inclusion, “the mediator isn’t a god,” and cannot always persuade the parties to include women. But research shows their inclusion is a worthwhile goal. In many instances, women have been key players in enabling a ceasefire and creating the environment for talks to proceed.

How to overcome this barrier? Know more here

Barrier Four: “This doesn’t concern women.”

“This doesn’t concern women.” Military and security issues are ‘technical’ and ‘not relevant’ to women peacebuilders.

Some argue that women do not need to be included in peace negotiations because the military and security issues on the table are not relevant to their concerns. Women are underrepresented in security and military roles, and may be perceived as lacking credibility without this experience. Conversely, there is a perception that so-called “women’s issues” are not relevant to the security-focused agenda.

But this dismissal overlooks the key role that these issues play in conflict dynamics—from sexual violence to the security needs of civilians during ceasefires. When they are included in peace talks, women consistently broaden the set of issues to be discussed, raising a variety of short-term and long-term security and development issues. This agenda ultimately helps push the process toward a more comprehensive agreement and a more lasting peace.

How to overcome this barrier? Know more here.

Barrier Six: “The exclusion of women is cultural.”

“The exclusion of women is cultural,” and “the peace table isn’t the place to deal with gender equality.”

If the exclusion of women from peace processes was a cultural phenomenon, then we would see significant differences between Colombia and Syria, Burma and Burundi—places that are very different from each other. Yet the exclusion of women from peacemaking is common to all these cases. It is a universal phenomenon, suggesting that other factors are relevant, notably that the peace table is a place where power is brokered and shared. Those who come to the table want to keep it limited. They neither want to share the power nor be accountable to alternative forces. At the same time, some argue that the peace table is no place to address sensitive cultural norms, either through women’s participation or through placing issues of gender equality on the agenda. But the assumption that women come to the table only to demand gender equality is false.

How to overcome this barrier? Know more here

“The BPT is outstanding…a wealth of good information, and a very accessible guide for practitioners…really the best comprehensive guide of its kind drawing on widespread evidence from across the geographic spectrum.”

— Ambassador Don Steinberg, President and CEO of World Learning and Former US Envoy to Angola

+1 202 986 0952
info@icanpeacework.org
media@icanpeacework.org
Suite 524, 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20036

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This